Police check

Police check

Police check work is route-sensitive and strongest for Australia-issued records, with other jurisdictions mainly apostille-led.

What usually matters first

Start with the document itself, then check the issuing side, destination side, and receiving requirements.

  • Check whether fingerprint or non-fingerprint version is expected.
  • Confirm validity window with the receiving side.
  • Use intake after pathway and issue date are checked.

Practical notes

This section keeps to the public-facing points that usually matter first. Final handling still depends on the issuing authority, receiving side, and document format.

Australia-issued police checks

Usually handled inside the Australian main lane. This is the strongest and most commercially stable police-check route, but the file still needs review for issue date, identity setup, and receiving-side validity window.

Official baseline
  • Australian Federal Police requires proof of identity documents totalling at least 100 points
  • If fingerprints are required, the original fingerprint form must be posted with the application
  • Applicants must state the purpose of the police check, and the purpose can affect the result issued
EGS intake screening
  • Passport and identity material ready for pre-screening
  • Driver licence, or one supporting item such as visa, Medicare card, utility bill, or bank statement
  • Current police-check variant and issue date should be identified before the route is fixed

This screening is for preliminary route assessment only and is not legal advice. Original documents may still be required depending on document type, issuing authority, destination, and receiving-side requirements.

Expedite position

Officially, AFP says most online non-fingerprint certificates are completed within days, while fingerprint checks take 15 to 30 business days. EGS can discuss faster handling on some Australian-side steps, but only after checking whether the file is non-fingerprint or fingerprint-based.

Review note: Best suited where the receiving side is clear and the client is not mixing different police-check variants.

Canada-issued police checks

Canada police-check work often splits between RCMP fingerprint files and non-fingerprint local clearances. The intake difference matters commercially because the material set and timing are not the same.

Official baseline
  • For Canadian immigration-related police certificates, fingerprints must be submitted electronically to the RCMP CCRTIS system
  • Electronic fingerprint submission from outside Canada is not directly available; overseas ink fingerprints must be digitised by an accredited company within Canada
  • Paper submissions are not processed for that RCMP route
EGS intake screening
  • Two valid IDs should be ready before screening
  • For RCMP routes, original notarised or officially stamped fingerprint card is usually the workable starting point
  • For selected non-fingerprint routes, informed-consent scan and route purpose should be checked separately

This screening is for preliminary route assessment only and is not legal advice. Original documents may still be required depending on document type, issuing authority, destination, and receiving-side requirements.

Expedite position

Official timing depends heavily on whether the route is fingerprint-based and how the fingerprints reach the accredited Canadian channel. EGS treats non-fingerprint and RCMP fingerprint files as different products and does not present them as interchangeable rush options.

Review note: This route should be framed around the actual filing purpose, not just “Canada police clearance”.

United States-issued police checks

US police-check work may involve a federal FBI route or a state-level route. Those are not interchangeable from a review perspective, especially where the receiving side expects a specific authority level.

Official baseline
  • FBI Identity History Summary requests are fingerprint-based; the FBI does not offer name checks for this route
  • Applicants may submit electronically or by mail, but a current fingerprint card is required
  • If fingerprints are repeatedly rejected, the FBI advises taking multiple sets, preferably with a fingerprint technician
EGS intake screening
  • Passport bio page
  • For FBI processing, original I-783 form and two original fingerprint cards are the practical baseline for many files
  • If the client is asking about “urgent”, first distinguish FBI route from state-level route
  • Some state-level routes can be lighter, but receiving-side acceptance still needs checking first

This screening is for preliminary route assessment only and is not legal advice. Original documents may still be required depending on document type, issuing authority, destination, and receiving-side requirements.

Expedite position

The FBI says electronic requests are processed faster once the completed fingerprint card is received, but it does not treat federal and state products as the same workflow. EGS therefore screens the authority level first before discussing any rush expectation.

Review note: Electronic issuance can simplify downstream handling, but only if the receiving side accepts that format.

United Kingdom-issued police checks

UK police certificate work is usually document-clean, but the file is only strong when the address proof, photo standard, and authorisation setup are all aligned at the outset.

Official baseline
  • GOV.UK directs applicants needing a UK police certificate for visa or emigration use to ACRO, with standard and premium service windows published there
  • For legalisation, GOV.UK states that ACRO police certificates for England and Wales are not eligible for an e-Apostille
  • Applicants should confirm with the receiving side whether an original police certificate and paper apostille are required
EGS intake screening
  • Police certificate application form or equivalent application setup
  • Current residential address proof
  • Colour passport scan and compliant white-background photo
  • Signed authorisation scan where representative handling is involved

This screening is for preliminary route assessment only and is not legal advice. Original documents may still be required depending on document type, issuing authority, destination, and receiving-side requirements.

Expedite position

GOV.UK currently describes ACRO police certificate service windows as 20 days or 2 days. EGS still treats urgency as file-dependent, because weak address proof or missing authority paperwork can still stop the case from moving cleanly.

Review note: Professional presentation matters here: weak address proof or casual photo preparation is a common avoidable drag on the file.

Singapore-issued police checks

Singapore police-certificate matters are usually more detail-sensitive than clients expect. The requesting-authority letter, fingerprint capture, and personal background information often decide whether the file is ready to move.

Official baseline
  • SPF requires documentary proof that the COC is required and the purpose of the COC
  • Applicants who are not using Singpass but previously held a FIN must submit fingerprint impressions recorded by an authorised institution
  • SPF currently issues the COC digitally and states full documentation is needed before approval
EGS intake screening
  • Passport copy and Singapore pass copy, including prior FIN information where relevant
  • White-background photo and usable fingerprint record where the route requires it
  • Letter or screenshot from the requesting authority showing the certificate requirement
  • Personal background details such as address, purpose, family status, and prior residence or study history where requested

This screening is for preliminary route assessment only and is not legal advice. Original documents may still be required depending on document type, issuing authority, destination, and receiving-side requirements.

Expedite position

SPF says processing runs about 7 to 14 days from receipt of a complete application. EGS treats any rush request cautiously because missing proof letters, FIN issues, or unusable fingerprints will usually matter more than office-side speed.

Review note: This is a route where incomplete background answers make the file look weak very quickly.